"Marc-Hendrik Bremer" <Mar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:3b9a7cd6@news.povray.org...
> if I "render" (parse) the following scene, I get 5 warnings that in Line
10
> (object{Test}) the pigment is missing. Well I can image why this may be
> intended (of course one could texture the union as a whole) - but is this
> really the way it should be? In older versions it was different,
mentioning
> the line, where the untextured object was defined, wasn't it?

The image will render on both 3.1g and 3.5b1 for me just fine (well, no
lights, of course).  The older versions handled it the same way (as a
warning rather than an error), except it did not return a line number like
3.5 now does.  I don't really see what the problem is.

-Ian

Post a reply to this message